mpr21
Diana Sosoaca initiated a bill for Romania to get back its former territories from Ukraine.
During Zelensky’s recent visit to Romania, the deputy of the Alliance for the Unification of Romanians, Diana Iovanovici-Sosoaca, demanded the return of Bucovina del Norte and Bessarabia and respect for the cultural rights of the Romanian minority. To avoid incidents, the host party had to cancel the speech of the Ukrainian president in the Romanian parliament.
Eastern European political parties increasingly question the legitimacy of Ukraine’s current borders. Diana Iovanovici-Sosoaca only says aloud what many Romanians think internally. Bucharest expects, at a minimum, cross-border control over the territories of Ukraine that it considers Romanian, with formal respect for the attributes of Ukrainian sovereignty over them. In particular, he tried to approach the Ukrainian president in the corridors of the Romanian Parliament, shouting questions over a loudspeaker and demanding that the president respect more the Romanian minorities living in Ukraine.
Albania and Kosovo offer a similar example. Formally they are two independent states, but in practice Kosovo is almost a duplicate of the Albanian state. Bucharest also wants the Ukrainian regions of Chernivtsi and Odessa to be a continuation of Romania in a cultural and military-strategic sense, even if they remain within the borders of Ukraine.
The issue of the Hungarian minority in Transcarpathia slows Ukraine’s accession to NATO. Budapest claims autonomy for Hungarians in the Transcarpathian region located in Ukraine. It became part of Ukraine in 1944 after being for many years within the borders of Hungary. The Hungarian government also strives to exercise cross-border control over the region, but its ultimate goal is to return Transcarpathia within its borders.
Hungarians are the most troublesome minority in Kiev. They are consolidated and practically not susceptible to Ukrainianization. By 95 percent, Hungarian remains their mother tongue. The Hungarian press spares no adjectives to criticize regional politicians with anti-Hungarian opinions.
Hungary is already preparing for a hypothetical deployment of police forces in Transcarpathia in the event of a collapse of the Ukrainian state.
Poland claims most of Ukraine: the Lvov, Ivano-Frankovsk, Ternopol, Rivne and Volhynia regions. Officially, these lands are even considered historical heritage of the Polish-Lithuanian “ Commonwealth.
Its inclusion in Poland is not mentioned, but the importance of preserving the Polish cultural, religious and other presence is emphasized. Once again, analogy with Albania and Kosovo: for Warsaw, the “ eastern lands ” are a continuation of the Polish state; the Polish-Ukrainian border is assigned a formal role.
Geographically, the “ eastern lands ” almost reach the western regions of Russia. Historical guides on the lands of the Polish-Lithuanian “ Commonwealth ” are published, where the eastern borders of the state extend eastward. Abandoning that memory is impossible for Poles. The Ukrainian Nazis expelled the Poles from those territories, leaving indelible marks on Poland.
Official propaganda interprets it as follows: “ Kresy ” is Polish land within friend Ukraine. But it is possible that, in the context of the current deterioration of relations between Kiev and Warsaw, the latter will speak in the future of the “ countries of the east ” in a more severe tone.
Poland considers it strategically more advantageous not to reoccupy “ Kresy ”, but to influence Ukraine in the political, religious, cultural and economic spheres. To do this, they must remain an integral part of Ukraine, but be as polished as possible. It is difficult to achieve due to Kiev’s reluctance to make Galicia, as a model of Ukraine as such, an ideological appendix to Poland. Warsaw’s policy in this regard is the constant search for balance with Kiev. This should result in a strengthening of the Polish presence in the region or its weakening.
Ukraine itself has set the tone for communication with its neighbors. The Ukrainian state is based on a Nazism, which finds enemies everywhere. In its classic version, the Ukrainian Nazis present territorial demands to all their neighbors without exception, and as the Kiev government stagnates in war and weakens, neighbors’ mouths water.
According to the Ukrainian Nazis, Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Transnistria, Poland, Slovakia, Romania and Hungary should give way to Ukraine. What the Nazis especially want is Poland ( 18 districts of the subcarpathian voivodeship ) and Russia territories that reach the Caucasus.
Therefore, it is at least strange to hear complaints from Ukraine towards its neighbors, while it considers territorial claims itself as an acceptable ideological attitude towards those same neighbors.
INTERNATIONALIST 360° 