Canada, US and OAS vs. Venezuela: Arbitrary to the Extreme

Following the lead of the U.S., Canada is arbitrarily manipulating “democracy,” “human rights” and “political prisoners” to subvert the Bolivarian Revolution.

By Arnold August

On March 23, 2017, Canada along with  Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, the U.S. and Uruguay adopted a declaration on Venezuela. However, these 14 member states voting in favor of a resolution to invoke the Inter-American Democratic Charter of the OAS as a pretext to interfere in Venezuela was not sufficient to carry approval among the 35 members.

Nonetheless, while the declaration was not posted on the OAS website because it could not have been considered an officially approved document, sponsoring countries such as the U.S. and  Canada posted it on their respective government websites. Thus, it remains the political platform of these 14 countries and unofficially of the OAS itself whose Secretary-General Luis Almagro is a servile instrument of the U.S.

The declaration cites “democracy,” “human rights” and political prisoners.  Let us take each one of these issues to illustrate how they are arbitrarily wielded in the OAS.

Canada has been a member of the OAS since 1990. However, we in Canada are justified in asking Canadian governments why it has never called a special meeting of the OAS to consider U.S. violations of democracy and basic electoral principles. To take only some recent examples, was not Bush’s dubious electoral victory in 2000 worthy of an OAS investigation?

More recently, it came to light that the Obama/Clinton campaign collaborated with the conglomerate media like CNN to subvert the Sanders campaign. In the same 2016 elections, it was clear for the whole world to see that the Electoral College system, as the direct result of the wealthy slave owners that fashioned the electoral process to keep the majority disenfranchised, is not democratic.

Would all these flagrant violations of democracy not be worthy of consideration by the OAS?  Furthermore, the U.S. is the only country in the West whereby, even after having served their prison terms, millions of felons (depending on the states) lose their right to vote for life either by law or through intimidating and cumbersome recourse to recuperate their suffrage rights. Blacks consist of a highly disproportionate percentage of the victims resulting from these voting rights violations. All this and more, but no intervention in the OAS by the Canadian government regarding democracy in the U.S.

Ottawa’s record on bringing Washington to task in the OAS on violation of human rights is likewise cowardly. During the entire Obama administration, Blacks have been gunned down in the streets by the racist state as a vestige of slavery. Does this not consist of the most gruesome example of human rights violations? It is only equaled to the century-long genocide of the native peoples going into 2016 and 2017 as exemplified by the Standing Rock struggle. Yet, not a whimper by Canada in the OAS as this country also ignored the record number of deportations of Latinos by the Obama administration being followed up and increased by Trump.

The inconsistent Canadian policy with regards to political prisoners is as cynical as its stance on democracy and human rights. The U.S. has the highest per-capita prison population in the world. While all the incarcerated are of course not political prisoners, the incarceration system is indeed politically motivated. In this context, there are also hundreds of political prisoners such as Leonard Peltier, Native Indian leader and icon serving 35 years, and Mumia Abu Jamal, a Black activist incarcerated since 1981. Why does Canada not look south right across the border to raise, in the OAS, this issue of political prisoners rather than the supposed political prisoners in Venezuela?

Canada’s position in the OAS represents the epitome of arbitrariness. If any country should be investigated in the OAS, it should be the U.S. and not Venezuela.

Canada’s stance does not take into account the anti-U.S. imperialist sentiment of an important section of Canadian society. Specifically, Canadians from all walks of life have demonstrated and issued statements all over the country in support of the Bolivarian Revolution, the heritage of Hugo Chávez and against foreign interference.

The Canadian government’s servile attitude toward the U.S. does, however unwittingly, highlight the significance of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) that includes the 33 sovereign countries in the Americas except for the U.S. and Canada. CELAC’s further development is the only answer to the OAS, which is based on the U.S. and Canadian governments’ U.S.-centric outlook on democracy, human rights, and political prisoners.

In Venezuela, ¡They Shall Not Pass!

Arnold August Canadian author/journalist:


My personal outrage against the U.S./OAS threats of further interference in Venezuela finds it inspiration in two sources.

Firstly, I am moved by the deep-seated anti-U.S. imperialist sentiment of increasingly larger sections of people in Canada. Since the latest series of provocations against the Bolivarian Revolution, its constitutionally-elected President NicolásMadura and the historic figure of Hugo Chávez, the awareness in Canada of these manoeuvres is on the increase. Canadians from all walks of life have demonstrated, picketed and issued statements in support of the Bolivarian Revolution and its right to solve its own problems according to its own constitutional norms.

Furthermore, millions of Canadians have a long standing suspicion of U.S. imperialist policies in the region based on their own direct experience of visiting Cuba as the main source of tourism to the island. The majority of these travellers return from Cuba with a deep resentment against the U.S. resulting from the palpable damaging effects of the blockade which is part of the U.S.-centuries long objective to dominate the entire region south of the Rio Grande. Thus, any U.S. aggressive policy in the south including that being waged against Venezuela is viewed with a virtual automatic reaction based on distrust and indignation.

My second source of inspiration, in addition to the people here, consists of the Chavistas themselves. One instance among many others was my experience in Caracas during the first week of March 2017. I and other delegates from around the world had the opportunity to listen and to, exchange with, outstanding leaders such as Héctor Rodríguez, the deputy leading the Chavista block in the National Assembly. Likewise when Maduro addressed us during that visit we all went way with the deep conviction of the need to increase the support for the Bolivarian Revolution and denounce the American government and corporate media every step of the way.

Dear Chavistas, this is what we are doing! You are not alone!

August, author/journalist, member of the Network of Intellectuals in Defense of Humanity (Canada)