Chris Stevens’ Murder A Smokescreen For Joint NATO-CIA Exercises In Benghazi?
Update: The Libyan Resistance Did Not Kill Ambassador Stevens
Alexandra Valiente
Libya 360°
There are a plethora of questions surrounding the alleged attack on US diplomatic staff in Benghazi and the context in which the events supposedly took place.
As more information emerges it is clear that the narratives being circulated by both mainstream and alternative media are rife with irreconcilable contradictions which expose the necessity of a much deeper investigation.
Felicity Arbuthnot highlights some of the most troubling anomalies in her recent article.
One critical fact she draws our attention to is this,
“In a nation which lets its grief hang out as no other, oddly, daily searches find no funeral announcements for Ambassador Stevens or U.S. Air Force veteran Sean Smith, with ten years as an information management officer in what has been since 2009, Hillary Clinton’s State Department.”
Why the silence?
Although I do not concur with reports that the assassination of Ambassador Stevens was the work of the Libyan Resistance, I concede that depending on what actually happened in Benghazi and the surrounding area, the confusion such an attack could elicit, followed by days of protests, would provide excellent cover for Resistance strikes.
Today Bill Van Auken reports ,
“The September 11 attack that claimed the life of the US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, and three other Americans disrupted a major CIA operation in the North African country.”
“According to the New York Times, at least half of the nearly two dozen US personnel evacuated from the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi following the fatal attack on the US consulate and a secret “annex” were “CIA operatives and contractors.”
Contrary to the New York Times report, there is no US consulate in Benghazi.
Mark Robertson and Finian Cunningham expose the “US consulate” deception and more…
“Regarding the Benghazi incident, most people refer to “the US consulate,” when in reality the US site in Benghazi was not an embassy or a consulate, or even a “compound”. It was a collection of villas (that is, a gated community) privately owned by one Mohammad Al Bishari, who was leasing the villas to US State Department personnel.” Reports have emphasized that Ambassador Stevens and his colleagues were staying in villas that had no security.”
No security?
Yet according to CNN’s report on the journal entries made by Chris Stevens, he was concerned about the increased presence of Islamic extremists and believed that he was on an al Qaeda hit list.
This report from The Independent raises the question as to why no action was taken to protect staff when the US government had 48 hours warning that an attack was immanent.
Also, the Times report cited in Bill Van Auken’s article is misleading when it asserts that, “the CIA “began building a meaningful but covert presence in Benghazi” within months of the February 2011 revolt in Benghazi that seized the city from forces loyal to the government of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.”
The CIA established a covert presence in Libya immediately following the September 1, 1969 Al Fateh Revolution, when Muammar Gaddafi staged a bloodless coup that toppled King Idris who, subservient to imperialist powers, permitted the nation to languish in abject poverty while colonial empires ravaged Libya’s rich resources.
The CIA conducted ongoing operations in a relentless effort to destabilize the country and obstruct Libya’s transformation from the poorest nation in the world to one that surpassed most Western nations on the United Nations Human Rights and Development Indexes.
It is well known that the CIA made no less than six assassination attempts on the life of Muammar Gaddafi before his brutal murder in October, 2011. (This does not include Operation El Dorado Canyon – 1986 or the eight months of steady aerial bombardments by NATO’s 2011 Operation Odyssey Dawn/Unified Protector Campaign when strategic strikes targeted homes of the Gaddafi family members as well as annihilating over 100,000 Libyans and destroying most of the country’s vital infrastructure.)
The CIA Base Files On Covert Ops In Libya offer some insight into their Libyan operations.
Five years prior to the outbreak of the CIA-backed armed insurrection, there was a marked escalation of covert activity.
One company deployed by the CIA and the US Department of Defense was AECOM, an intelligence front organization specializing in assisting the US DoD in “political transition” projects.
In 2007 AECOM sent 50 employees and their families to Libya. They were stationed in Benghazi where the insurrection began. (More information…)

Benghazi is presently the main military base from which NATO launches offensives against neighboring African nations and designated targets in the Middle East.
How credible is it that they would be vulnerable to attack as we have been led to believe in the media narratives?
Terrorist training camps in Libya prepare militias for combat in Syria.
So is it possible that events in Benghazi were part of a NATO-AFRICOM exercise and the problematic narratives merely a smokescreen for something far more sinister?
Consider Southland, Southern Mistrel, or more recently, Mali and Operation Flintlock 2012.
Media reports stated Flintlock 2012 was postponed due to the coup in Mali when a closer analysis suggests the coup was Flintlock 2012 in action.
Why the need for the US to suddenly deny their close working relationship with Islamic extremists?
The West Point Document revealed that the “Libyan rebels” were the same terrorists who slaughtered US personnel in Iraq.
The relationship between the US, the CIA, NATO and al Qaeda is decades long and has been mutually advantageous.
As war efforts escalate against Syria, with Iran in the line of sight, Islamist terror cells from every region are converging in Damascus. The Muslim Brotherhood are reaping a rich harvest from the “Arab Spring” orgy of CIA destabilizations. There is every indication that the relationship between the Islamists and the West is irrevocably conjoined.
Whatever the truth may be regarding events in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, I am certain that they were planned in advance, that they were controlled and well coordinated and that they will serve imperialist interests as the war theater continues its advance throughout Africa and the Middle East.
© Copyright 2011-2012 by Libya 360° and Viva Libya!.
This page may be republished for non-commercial purposes as long as reprints include a verbatim copy of the article/page in its entirety, respecting its integrity and cite the author and Libya 360° and Viva Libya! as the source including a live link to the article/page.

This was very provocative. I found this 2011 interview with Webster Tarpley about the 46 separate military exercises happening on 911. There could have been several exercises taking place in Benghazi and just like 911, most of the personnel wouldn’t have known they were involved in a drill. The panic probably started when the drills flipped to live. In both cases there wasn’t any active defense.
Click to listen (or download)
“The 46 Exercises and Drills of 9/11″ with Webster Griffin Tarpley. Military exercises and drills in the decade before September 11th, and on the day of; drills that then go live; MIHOP v. LIHOP; the goal of 9/11; the stand down order; lack of air defense; the Pentagon; Angel Is Next; Amalgam Virgo; Able Danger; Able Warrior; P2OG; Vigilant Guardian; Global Guardian; Amalgam Warrior; Doomsday Aircraft equipped with the Looking Glass Communication System, etc.
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/73129
http://tarpley.net/docs/drills_of_911.pdf
What next?
Thank you Al Zahra.
There was a NATO-AFRICOM exercise taking place the day of the “attack” but I have not been able to confirm the location.
“US Africom Tuesday, 11 September 2012 16:08 … begun the U.S. Army Africa sponsored Eastern Accord 2012 Counter Violent Extremism Exercise.”
http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=27648:exercise-eastern-accord-2012-kicks-off&catid=56:diplomacy-a-peace&Itemid=111.
What is curious is the post has been deleted. This was all I could get from a cache:
“The 10-day training exercise, which will help build partnerships with USARAF and the East African military forces, is designed to help USARAF and East African participants improve their capability to respond to regional security threats posed by Violent Extremist Groups and to more effectively counter the associated Violent Extremist Ideology.”
“Defeating terrorism and violent extremism require a long term and collective strategic efforts; and a break with the old patterns.”
“It is now high time we fight these old enemies with both a regional and a global reach.”
“Our focus during this exercise is countering violent extremism…However, we must ascribe the proper level of importance to the value if working together–together we will focus on the Army’s importance in securing stability and security for our respective nations.”
Note the focus of the exercise and that it was scheduled to last 10 days.
RE: the 46 separate “exercises” taking place on September 11, 2001.
“There could have been several exercises taking place in Benghazi and just like 911, most of the personnel wouldn’t have known they were involved in a drill. The panic probably started when the drills flipped to live. In both cases there wasn’t any active defense.”
Absolutely, Al Zahra.
We have reports stating there were no guards that night, yet other reports state it was usually heavily guarded and secure.
It’s very strange that link is forbidden. I managed to get a screen shot of the cached page. This theory makes the most sense and explains the massive media lies combined with a news blackout of what’s happening inside Libya.
Click for full screen.
I found this on Eastern Accord:
http://www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=8261
Public docs on activities:
http://www.africom.mil/activities.asp
“In the North African desert, the al-Qaida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb organization is committed to destabilizing the trans-Sahara region and Northwest Africa. But its pursuits also threaten European allies across the Mediterranean Sea, as well as the United States.
He also noted concerns in the Gulf of Guinea, a major transit point for illicit trafficking in drugs, weapons and humans bound predominantly for Europe. In addition, a violent group known as Boko Haram has extended its influence to challenge the central government in Nigeria – a major economic power in Africa and a contributor to United Nations peacekeeping missions.
Africa’s vast natural resources compound the region’s strategic importance, particularly oil that’s exported to the United States.
“Access to the global commons, and stability in Western Africa and in those important sea lines of communication that run through the Gulf of Guinea and through Western Africa, remain important.”
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116839
It’s all about resources.
Thank you Hakomi for the extra information.
Sabina I do appreciate your saving the page.
According to today’s NYT the FBI have been sequestered in Tripoli for the past 16 days unable to enter Benghazi.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/28/world/africa/libya-attack-investigation-hobbled-by-security-fears.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Thank you Ahmed,
That report is impossible. The FBI have the US marines and all of NATO at their disposal. If Benghazi was safe enough for “friendly protests” and civilian crowds and media are going through the scene of the alleged crime picking up “evidence”, why is the FBI not there?
Inexplicable anomalies in addition to no FBI investigations pointing to a massive cover-up:
1-There is no consulate in Benghazi yet reports keep stating that there was
2-No funeral for Ambassador Stevens
3-Conflicting reports as to whether he was dead or alive when found and where his body was found and the cause of death
4-Reports that the villas were burned to the ground, even the vehicles, while early photos showed the structures were intact and you could see blood-smeared walls, ransacked offices and living quarters
5-Reports that say everything was incinerated, but a paper journal manages to survive and is picked up by a CNN journalist???
6-First it was the Resistance, then it was militias, then Al Qaeda, now the latest reports insist it was not Al Qaeda
7-Reports that Benghazi is secure, alongside reports that it is in a state of chaos, with daily bombings, etc., etc…
8-Reports that Benghazi is safe and well guarded but Tripoli is in a state of chaos and terror… so why are US embassy staff and the FBI in Tripoli???
9-I have read reports that there is a slaughter happening in Benghazi and Eastern Libya via aerial attacks from drones and helicopters
10-Other reports claim the Resistance took over the Benina airport and are shooting down drones and helicopters with anti-aircraft missiles
11-Reports that the Resistance are bombing Tripoli daily which contradict other reports that it is Belhaj’s men doing the bombings
12-Reports that the US and Libyan governments had 48 hours prior warning yet failed to step up security or notify the embassy staff of danger is suspect and typical of false flags or “military drills”.
I feel a growing concern about what is really happening in Libya.
The only sources that state unequivocally that the Resistance are behind these events and currently have the upper hand, have absolutely no contact within the Resistance and have admitted it.
Those with the Resistance or who have contacts are NOT saying anything.
A few weeks ago Dr. Hamza came out to refute reports that they were responsible for the Tripoli bombings and other events where civilians were placed at risk. They cannot keep making public statements to refute every single false claim. There are too many.
In spite of calls to abandon planned protests after Friday prayers, anti-militia protests turned violent in Tripoli and pro-Islamist protests resulted in casualties in Benghazi. They’re still going on last I checked.
NATO’s offering to help bolster Libya’s security to combat al Qaeda while Clinton just doled out an additional $45Mmil to support their terrorist campaigns.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2012/Sep-29/189565-nato-offers-libya-security-reform-help-with-armed-groups.ashx#axzz27oq3KTau
Troops were deployed to Libya and Yemen under the US war powers act.
http://rapsinews.com/publications/20120919/264722061.html
Although AFRICOM denies it I’m convinced plans are in the works to move the HQ from Germany to Libya.
Álvaro,
“Although AFRICOM denies it I’m convinced plans are in the works to move the HQ from Germany to Libya.”
I agree but I’m still convinced NATO can be defeated in Libya.
mcc43 has good comments on this article:
http://libya360.wordpress.com/2012/09/14/was-the-assassination-of-us-ambassador-chris-stevens-an-inside-job/#comment-4720
She’s documenting reports on storify:
http://storify.com/mcc43_/libya
She posted this video:
There are links about escalating military activity in Africa and the Middle East:
U.S. preparing a strike in Libya, Northern Mali?
http://theaviationist.com/2012/09/25/us-strike-nafrica/
A-10 combat planes deploying to the Middle East
http://theaviationist.com/2012/09/28/a10-westover/
U.S Marine Corps F/A-18A Hornet jets deploying to the Middle East
http://theaviationist.com/2012/09/27/vmfa-314/
Alexandra posted this yesterday:
THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST MALI: A 3RD WORLD WAR WHICH HAS ALREADY BEGUN
http://libya360.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/les-dessous-du-complot-contre-le-mali-une-etape-cruciale-de-la-3eme-guerre-mondiale-qui-a-deja-commence/
Libya: NATO’s Military Outpost On A Third Continent
These ludicrous reports are an insult to our intelligence and the revolutionary spirit:
Tanks, RPGs and anti-aircraft guns surrendered as Tripoli weapons handover begins
Carnival atmosphere in Benghazi as weapons collection gets underway
Algeria breaks up suspected terrorist network sending fighters to Libya
Libyan militias give up weapons — and get chance to win an iPad
Hang on to those weapons and turn them against the occupiers and their pathetic sniveling, groveling representatives!
This article was in AFRICOM’s Stuttgart website feed.
http://www.africom.mil/
It’s an obvious red herring. There are 2 CIA’s, a point driven home by several respected ex-analysts including Ret. CIA, Ray McGovern and NSA’s Phil Giraldi.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-cia-libya-20120926,0,5855746.story
This report implies Eastern Accord had a seminar in Tanzania, but what about the 10 day exercises?
http://www.army.mil/article/86971/Eastern_Accord_2012_Exercise_kicks_off/
House committee: Security requests denied in Libya
White House widening covert war in North Africa
WASHINGTON (AP) — Small teams of special operations forces arrived at American embassies throughout North Africa in the months before militants launched the fiery attack that killed the U.S. ambassador in Libya. The soldiers’ mission: Set up a network that could quickly strike a terrorist target or rescue a hostage.
But the teams had yet to do much counterterrorism work in Libya, though the White House signed off a year ago on the plan to build the new military task force in the region and the advance teams had been there for six months, according to three U.S. counterterror officials and a former intelligence official. All spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the strategy publicly.
The counterterror effort indicates that the administration has been worried for some time about a growing threat posed by al-Qaida and its offshoots in North Africa. But officials say the military organization was too new to respond to the attack in Benghazi, where the administration now believes armed al-Qaida-linked militants surrounded the lightly guarded U.S. compound, set it on fire and killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Republicans have questioned whether the Obama administration has been hiding key information or hasn’t known what happened in the immediate aftermath of the attack. They are using those questions in the final weeks before the U.S. elections as an opportunity to assail President Barack Obama on foreign policy, an area where he has held clear leads in opinion polls since the killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011.
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/White-House-widening-covert-war-in-North-Africa-3913022.php#ixzz28C8TO4mi
Angelina, you said there are 2 CIA’s. We would be underestimating the enemy if we only look that far. There are multiple agencies buried in black projects that have no limits, no accountability and are beyond scrutiny. Then there are the various branches of the military and the NSA with the same compartmentalized web of secret networks.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/pentagons-black-budget-grows-to-more-than-50-billion/
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/01/science/01patc.html?_r=1
Thank you for the AFRICOM links.
Álvaro,
It would be interesting if WikiLeaks could obtain and publish cables from Libya that clarify exactly what the embassy relayed to the State Department re: safety concerns.
I am watching reports closely and there is a great deal happening inside Libya. Hot spots most mentioned are Bani Walid, Sabha, Misrata, Sirte, Benghazi and Tripoli.
From the imperialist perspective, the Islamists and Al Qaeda were never the problem.
Why I am concerned when I hear reports of counter-terrorism teams in any area is that they are there for a single purpose: to eliminate anyone who poses a threat to the imperialist’s hegemonic agenda.
Oversight committee questions for Hillary Clinton
http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/10.2.12-Issa-Chaffetz-to-Clinton.pdf
Hillary Clinton’s reply.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/fp_uploaded_documents/121002_2012-10-02%20Issa%20letter.pdf
Email Shows State Department Rejecting Request of Security Team at US Embassy in Libya
“The subject line of the email, from Miki Rankin, the post management officer for Libya and Saudi Arabia, reads “Termination of Tripoli DC-3 Support.”
Rankin informs Stevens and the others on the email, whose names have been redacted, that Undersecretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy “has determined that support for Embassy Tripoli using the DC-3 will be terminated immediately. Post’s request to continue use of the plane in support of the SST was considered. However, it was decided that, if needed, NEA will charter a special flight for their departure.”
Click to read
An “SST” is a Security Support Team, about 16 Special Forces troops assigned to protect officials from the U.S. State Department. This particular SST was assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli.
Shown the email uncovered by ABC News, a spokesman for the committee said the “document is consistent with what the Oversight Committee has been told by individuals who worked in Libya. Ambassador Stevens and the diplomatic mission in Libya made multiple security related requests that were turned down by Washington based officials. Security related transportation has been identified as one of the particular items where embassy personnel did not receive the support they sought.”"
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/email-shows-state-department-rejecting-request-of-security-team-at-us-embassy-in-libya/
It’s been confirmed now that Stevens was the point man for arms smuggling into Turkey and Syria from Libya.
I found these other articles about the Benghazi-Syria connection from Syria 360:
LIBYA AND THE GLOBALIST PLANS TO DESTABILIZE SYRIA
BALHAJ’S AL QAEDA STRIKES IN DAMASCUS
FREE SYRIAN ARMY COMMANDED BY MILITARY GOVERNOR OF TRIPOLI
NATO, AL QAEDA CAUGHT SHIPPING WEAPONS TO FSA BY SEA VIA BENGHAZI
LIBYAN MAN INDICTED, 20 CHARGED FOR SMUGGLING WEAPONS TO SYRIAN “REBELS”
SYRIA: THE EXPLOSIVE LUTFALLAH II ARMS SMUGGLING SCANDAL
NATO, AL QAEDA CAUGHT SHIPPING WEAPONS TO FSA BY SEA VIA BENGHAZI
LIBYA’S LIFG ARE AL QAEDA AND THEY ARE WAGING WAR AGAINST THE SYRIAN PEOPLE
LIBYANS AND TUNISIANS WORKING WITH ARMED TERRORISTS IN SYRIA
LARGEST SHIPMENT OF LIBYAN WEAPONS EN ROUTE TO TERRORISTS IN SYRIA
Gaddafi warned about al Qaeda but nobody listened. He also spoke of Zintan being led astray, the same group detaining Saif, if he’s even still alive.
Al Qaeda will Kill Us All
March 8, 2011 press conference
Why Did CIA Director Petraeus Resign? Why Was The U.S. Ambassador To Libya Murdered?
Witnesses Differ With U.S. Over When Libya Consulate Attack Began
CIA Spin: Petraeus Mistress Reveals Real Motive Behind Benghazi Attack?
Cover-up: Pentagon Releases Official Timeline Of Benghazi Attack
Petraeus Gagged? ‘Scandal Timing May Mean Political Cover-up’